Which of the following is a step you would NOT take to identify bad claims?
Examine your disputed and appealed claims
Create an asset campaign
Use filters to identify patterns in bad claims
Sort assets by active claims to help prioritize
Unfortunately, mistakes happen, and you can see bad claims later. So, cleaning up claims will enable legitimate content owners to control and monetize their copyrighted content. Also, bad claims could influence your reputation and even diminish your revenue from user-uploaded videos. That’s why you should run claim audit on a regularly.
Tip: if you see, that the majority of claims from a certain reference are bad, deactivate the reference.
There are many ways how you can pêrform your claim audit. Typically, the process is: to review top assets, review disputes, and appeals, review the top claims, review recent claims. Also, you can use different filters to make these tasks easier. As a result, you can identify and isolate issues by applying additional filters as you sort claims. For example, if you discover bad claims originating from a specific channel or show, you can take measures to limit Content ID matching from that source.
So, which of the following is a step you would NOT take to identify bad claims? Well, creating asset campaign certainly wont help with it.
Learn more on the official Google support website.